Episodes Tagged with "Gilruth"
Posted on February 12, 2015
Using a model at upper left, William Rector of General Dynamics Corp. describes the design his company proposed for the Apollo lunar mission
Spacecraft modules in this drawing were identified in the Space Task Group’s request for proposals from contractors for developing and producing the command module
Saturn 1 test
Saturn 1 test 2
mySuperLamePic_c1194b7fa9498eb5af694d8530d3ebf8
At lower left, E. E. Clark and Carlos de Moraes of the Martin Company display three of a dozen command module configurations considered before the choice of the one to the right
ASA’s second Administrator, James E. Webb (at center above), and George M. Low (right above) of NASA Headquarters receive a model of General Electric’s proposed vehicle
Posted on February 19, 2015
David G. Hoag, technical design director at the laboratory, examines the inertial measuring unit that would measure changes in Apollo spacecraft velocity when propulsion systems were fired
MIT Instrumentation Laboratory Director C. Stark Draper inspects a mockup of the Apollo guidance and control system in the September 1963
astronaut positions
Posted on February 26, 2015
John_Houbolt_and_LOR2
Earth Orbit Rendezvous
Apollo_Direct_Ascent
Posted on March 5, 2015
12-Second stage (S-IV)
11-Booster stage (S-I)
10-Proposed C-2
9-C-1 and earlier vehicles
8-Model of blockhouse at Launch Complex 34
7-Vehicles using Titan and Atlas stages
6-Saturn C
5-Saturn B
4-Preliminary concept of Launch Complex 34, Cape Canaveral
3-Early H-1 Engine
2-Thor-Jupiter engine
1-Proposed configuration of a clustered booster
Posted on March 26, 2015
two landing techniques proposed for the direct ascent mode
SA-1
RendezvousMethods
proposed lunar-surface-rendezvous procedure, a propellant-transfer vehicle takes fuel from the tanker to a manned space vehicle. After loading the fuel, the two astronauts would fire the engine of their spacecraft to return to the earth
Major configuration changes in the Apollo spacecraft from May 1960 to July 1962
Early design concepts of C-1 and C-5 versions of the Saturn launch vehicles
A ferry that would leave a command ship in orbit around the moon, visit the lunar surface, and then return to the command ship for the voyage back to the earth
Posted on April 2, 2015
Early design concepts of C-1 and C-5 versions of the Saturn launch vehicles
NASA announced selection of the lunar-orbit-rendezvous landing technique at an 11 July 1962 press conference. left to right James E. Webb, Robert C. Seamans, Jr., D. Brainerd Holmes, and Joseph F. Shea
Harry C. Shoaf (Space Task Group Engineering Division 15 November 1961 of a proposed lunar lander to be used with an advanced version of the Mercury spacecraft
concept of a small lunar lander during descent to the surface of the moon, as proposed by Langley Research Center employees in October 1961
Posted on April 9, 2015
Shea uses models to demonstrate how the lunar module would dock with the command module
Rocket Comparison
Lunar orbit insertion
Posted on April 16, 2015
REF: 2-903-6 SA-2 LAUNCH AT CAPE. IGNITION OF ROCKET (SATURN 1 VEHICLE)
SA-2 erected on launch pedestal
Wernher_von_Braun_confers_with_Brainerd_Holmes_and_Nicholas_Golovin
Posted on April 23, 2015
The impact facility at North American was used to drop-test the CM
Selection of Little Joe II completed the Apollo family of launch vehicles.
Scott Carpenter, John Glenn, and Walter Schirra in 1963 inspect a full-scale mock up of the Apollo CM
North American Aviation Stormy,
Interior of a partial full-scale mockup of the Apollo command module
major parts of the command module structure
Posted on April 30, 2015
Posted on May 7, 2015
General Electric employees monitor activities of a spacecraft test in the automatic-checkout-equipment spacecraft control room in 1965
comparison of spacecraft and launch vehicle configuration
Apollo tracking network in 1966. Radar stations with large antennas for continuous tracking and communications were at Goldstone, California; Madrid, Spain; and Canberra, Australia
Posted on May 14, 2015
Full-scale model of the command module, above- the strake aerodynamic devices may be seen at either side of the spacecraft just above the aft heatshield
Removing LM from S=IVB stage
On 16 November 1963 in Cape Canaveral’s Blockhouse 37, NASA’s new manned space flight chief George Mueller
Communications with the moon as the earth turned. Astronauts on the moon’s surface also could talk to one another
Posted on May 21, 2015
download
The cabin section (or primary structure) of the CM is assembled at North American in 1965
The CM probe would slip into the LM’s dish-shaped drogue, and 12 latches on the docking ring would engage, to lock the spacecraft together, airtight
Full-scale model of the service module, resting on a mockup of a spacecraft-lunar module adapter, with panels off to reveal part of the internal arrangement
Jettison of the launch escape system (right) after successful launch, also pulls away the boost protective cover that protects the windows from flame and soot
On the drawing of the launch escape system at upper right, the canard aerodynamic devices are near the top of the escape tower
Posted on June 11, 2015
6-NASA engineers in 1964 decided that astronauts could stand in the lunar module cabin during the trip to the lunar surface. Note triangular windows
7-Proposed sleeping positions for astronauts on the moon
5-Mockup of lunar module cabin with seats
4-The drawing of the stage indicates positions of components
3-underside of the lunar module descent stage shows fuel tank installation
2-Administrator James Webb examines models of the lunar and command modules in docked position
1-Lunar module generations from 1962 (above left; the vehicle originally proposed by Grumman) to 1969
Posted on June 17, 2015
3-improved lunar module features – ladder, porch, hatch, and rendezvous window
2-he addition of a ladder on a landing gear leg made the task much easier
1- Astronauts found a knotted rope from the lunar module difficult to climb down (or up)
Posted on July 2, 2015
5-Removing the LEM
4-ApolloSpacecraftLMAdapterDiagram
3-Apollo_Spacecraft_diagram
2-Tm-1 mockup of the Lunar Module
1-lm-6-rendezvous-radar-antenna-assy-sm
Posted on July 9, 2015
4-SIV-SIVB
3-Saturn 1b-V
2-Cutaways
1- SIV_rocket_stage
Posted on July 23, 2015
3- 1230_Lunar_module_LTA-2_R
2-Disher_John_
1-Lunar_Module_diagram
Posted on July 30, 2015
2-NASA_Group_1_and_2_Astronauts_Photo_With_Autopens
2-Back row- See, McDivitt, Lovell, White, & Stafford. Front row- Conrad, Borman, Armstrong, & Young
1- Project_Mercury_AstronautsBack row- Shepard, Grissom, Cooper; front row- Schirra, Slayton, Glenn, Carpenter.
Posted on August 5, 2015
Group4Astronaut
4-Group 4 L-R- Garriott, Gibson. Front row, L-R- Michel, Schmitt, Kerwin.
3-Astronaut_Group_Three_-_GPN-2000-001476
Posted on August 13, 2015
5-Back row, from L-R- Swigert, Pogue, Evans, Weitz, Irwin, Carr, Roosa, Worden, Mattingly, Lousma. Front row, from L-R- Givens, Mitchell, Duke, Lind, Haise, Engle, Brand, Bull, McCandless
Posted on September 17, 2015
3-Astronauts Grissom, Chaffee, and White check the communications headgear in preparation for what was to have been the first manned Apollo flight – Apollo-Saturn 204, scheduled for 21 February 1967
2-CM-012 – Apollo One- arrives at Kennedy Space Center, 26 August 1966
1-Command module 012 and service module 012 in workstands at the North American Aviation plant, Downey, in 1965
Posted on October 1, 2015
Chaffee, White, and Grissom
apollo1-sketch-jg
the-Apollo-1-launch-pad-fire-that-killed-astronauts-Gus-Grissom-Roger-Chaffee-and-Ed-White-celebrities-who-died-young-31704639-1372-740
Posted on October 8, 2015
3-Apollo_1_patch
2-apollo1chaffee
1-Chaffee at the consoles in Mission Control during the Gemini 3 mission
Posted on October 15, 2015
1-1024px-AS-204_-_hatch
3-PrimeandBackupCrews
2-PrimeCrewAltitudeChamberTest
Posted on October 22, 2015
3-apollo
2-c216a
1-Apollo_1’s_Command_Module_-_GPN-2003-00057
Posted on October 29, 2015
CM parts were studied and catalogued in the Pyrotechnics Installation Building at Kennedy Space Center.
The CM wiring harness goes through x-ray inspection.
apollo-1-disassembly
Posted on November 5, 2015
Deputy Administrator Seamans, Administrator Webb, Manned Space Flight Administrator George E. Mueller, and Apollo Program Director Phillips testify before a Senate hearing on the Apollo accident
2-Apollo1Langley
1-Apollo1 Inve
Posted on November 12, 2015
LC34_memorial_benches
LC34plaque2 (1)
KSC_Launch_Complex_34
Apollo1plaque
Apollo_1_Silver-Colored_Fliteline_Medallion_(Flown_on_Apollo_9)
Posted on May 12, 2016
OwenMaynardStepstotheMoon
chief of the LEM engineering office in the Apollo Program Office in Houston, TexasJPG
3-GeorgeLow
Posted on May 19, 2016
IMG_0988
3-GEMueller
1-Samuel_C._Phillips
Posted on September 14, 2016
lm3-sigs
3
2-mcdivitt-and-schweickart-left-to-right-practice-in-the-lunar-module-simulator-for-the-apollo-9-mission-to-evaluate-the-lm-in-earth-orbit-operations-and-the-apollo-suit-in-the-space-environment
1-spacecraft-docking-devices-the-command-module-probe-and-docking-ring-at-right-the-lunar-module-drogue-at-left
Posted on August 15, 2013
WhiteRoom
tumblr_ma6ui4M49C1r6kbseo1_500
The_Celebration_for_Freedom_7_at_Huntsville,_Alabama_
SurvivalEquipment
shepard_freedom7_big
mercurycontrolPanel
mercury8
mercury7
mercury5
mercury3
kennedy-awarding-medal-to-astronaut-shepard
Kennedy,_Johnson,_and_others_watching_flight_of_Astronaut_Shepard_on_television,_05_May_1961
freedom7redstone
Freedom_7_Diagram
Freedom_7_Diagram – Copy
Untitled
Astronaut_Alan_Shepard_1961 – Copy
Alan_Shepard_pouso – Copy
Alan_Shepard_in_Mercury_flight_suit – Copy
800px-Mr3-flight-timeline – Copy
448px-Shepard_in_Space_Suit_MSFC-6417073 – Copy
Posted on June 13, 2018
P3-1024px-Apollo_13-insignia.svg
P2-Apollo 13 planned landing site
P1-Apollo 13 patch
Posted on August 29, 2013
Liberty_Bell_7_The_Kansas_Cosmosphere_and_Space_Center
513px-Grissom_lifted_from_water_61-MR4-82
Mercury_4_Hatch
1137px-Grissom_prepares_to_enter_Liberty_Bell_7_61-MR4-76
GusSuitup
460px-Mercury-Redstone_4_Launch_MSFC-6414824
Posted on February 6, 2014
The general arrangement of liquid rocket systems (OAMS and RCS) in the Gemini spacecraft
Gemini landing gear part of the land landing system along with the paraglider
fig41The B. F. Goodrich partial-wear full-pressure suit being developed for the Gemini program
fig33Figure 33. The emergency parachute recovery system for the half-scale paraglider flight test vehicle for Phase II-A of the development program – Copy
fig27Gemini spacecraft nomenclature – Copy
Agena B
Posted on February 12, 2014
fig58 Astronauts after a training session in desert near Stead Air Force Base, Nevada
Goal
fig54 Instrumented mannequin being lowered into a boilerplate Gemini spacecraft in preparation for a dynamic sled test of the Gemini ejection system
fig52 Gemini launch vehicle 1 undergoing tests in the vertical test facility at Martin’s Baltimore plant
fig51 POGO suppression equipment proved out in the Titan II development program
fig48 Proposed deployment sequence for the ballute stabilization device
fig47 Titan II flight N-15 was launched from Cape Canaveral on January 10, 1963
Posted on June 24, 2015
Posted on September 24, 2015
